Mechanical engineer goes full-crazy sociologist?
Where i propose post-woke policies of state funded prostitution to combat inceldom
Science is fallible.It’s trial and error process gives the advantage of demonstrating proof the few times things right,unlike other semi-religious ideologies.But humans are naturally conservative and risk averse(most people would chose 10.000$ over a coinflip of 0 and 50.000$)so we get the western oxymoron of a nation where the majority of people are dissatisfied with the economy,yet anyone suggesting a different proposal is shut down as a grifter or an evil commie.But without experimenting and getting things wrong progress is impossoble.Institutions holding power in western society are mainly the religious right and the woke left.Religious people are axiomatically oppositional to prostitution,wheres the woke left try to spread their gender blank slate ideology(that all gender differences are socially constructed by the patriarchy)and the biggest biological gender difference,that of sexual selection,would be exacerbated by such a policy,so the priesthood of both sides of the political spectrum would shun this idea.But the libertarian friendly substack gives enough space for me to make my case
ADVANTAGES OVER PRIVATE PROSTITUTION
Incels(involuntary celibate,usually straight men) are more likely to hold misogynistic views.They are also more likely to experience mental instability.Private prostitution objectifies the people participating,to the extent that women who participate and don’t get compensated sometimes say they ‘feel’ like they were raped.Clients also fail to alleviate their pain of social rejection,because their partner is engaging for economic benefit.If the state was paying the provider,both parties could engage voluntary without monetary motivations.Women with high sociosexuality are rare,some like Aella and Diana Fleischman can find rise to fame with their high intelligence,but the average woman of 100 iq is unlikely to provide social benefits to society equivalent to a public doctor or psychologisnt.If they idea of a state providing sexual resources to its citizens being labeled health care sounds radical,so did abortion 150 years ago.The normalization of this procedure would change the perception of promiscuous women from being lazy and taking the easy path(eg scammers) to individuals possessing a rare trait addressing popular market necessity(eg models),and reduce what we call ‘slut-shaming’ and ‘double standards’ many feminists revolt against.Sex negative feminists who get the ick imagining women offering sex should be more repulsed by their sons(or someone in their son’s friend group) fantasizing ‘saint’ Elliot Rodgers and rape caravans.The state getting involved in this business brings a bureaucratic vetting process that reduces the dangers usually associated with prostitution
CONTRA RAXIOTIS ON SOCIAL DEGENERACY
Men need to struggle to succeed!If hedonistic impulses are satisfied they will turn them to lazy socialists!
Most men who struggle have higher chance to end up in prison than CEO of Tesla and Instagram.Plus gay men have higher chance to get a degree and gay men couples make more money than straight ones,with a ‘body count’(different sexual partners) 10 times higher.Also having the state occasisonally provide sexual relief isn’t as high status as a loving and devoted partner(or many).People will still crave status
Girls will drop out of medical school and STEM!
This can already happen with Onlyfans.These position should have medium to low income to self select for people with high sociosexuality and openness,not corporate competitive types.I am not trying to pimp Marie Curie
Marriage will be even more prone to being broken!
This is an experimental proposal.These services can be denied to married people,but is such a marriage(where loyalty is based on lack of options) really worth defending?
This is my 1st post so i dont have links and citations,but i can provide anyone privately or in the comments